Living in Saku (佐久市)

Saku (佐久市) is a large place in Nagano (長野県), Japan, home to 99,131 people. Of the 29 household profiles on Nestlyzer, its strongest are early retirees (top 27%, #482 of 1,845), climate-conscious movers (top 34%, #626 of 1,877), single pensioners (top 38%, #653 of 1,762).

Residents99,131
Density– per km²
Area– km²
Hub airport139 km (Tokyo Haneda International)
Nearest city of 100k+28 km
Within 30 km440,400 people
Climate typeHumid subtropical (Cfa)
Terrain around itabout 950 m, height range 590 m
Main railway line1.0 km
Distance to Tokyo128 km
Within 10 km109,349 people
LandscapeJapan
Winter daylight9 h 41 min, sunset 8:35

See Saku (佐久市) on the map

Open in Nestlyzer

Good to know about Saku (佐久市)

How Saku (佐久市) ranks

Scores run 0 to 100 against every municipality in Japan. Ranks count only the places that pass each profile's minimums, so the totals differ by profile. Local data: official statistics on demographics, governance and fiscal strength, health and elderly, jobs and economy and safety and community (local or regional figures, sources on every place page) plus population and geography.

ProfileScoreIn JapanIn Nagano (長野県)
Young family59#701 of 1,813#53 of 72Map
Low-income household48#1,089 of 1,806#52 of 64Map
Low-income family55#852 of 1,717#51 of 64Map
Single parent59#709 of 1,604#39 of 50Map
Pensioner couple59#896 of 1,762#14 of 67Map
Single pensioner61#653 of 1,762#16 of 67Map
Early retiree67#482 of 1,845#4 of 66Map
Single professional55#622 of 1,454#10 of 49Map
Young professional55#684 of 1,405#11 of 45Map
DINKS58#593 of 1,201#10 of 34Map
Remote worker64#931 of 1,668#25 of 50Map
Commuter63#945 of 1,547#27 of 63Map
Car-free household58#621 of 1,256#9 of 38Map
Studentnot ranked: below the minimum for regional access–Map
First-home buyer52#1,014 of 1,717#52 of 64Map
Budget-constrained mover45#1,170 of 1,877#54 of 67Map
Urban lifestyle seeker51#599 of 1,327#8 of 42Map
Expat professional58#760 of 1,668#9 of 50Map
Healthcare-first mover49#865 of 1,762#16 of 67Map
Nature-focused household61#879 of 1,958#45 of 74Map
Cross-border commuter63#944 of 1,949#45 of 72Map
Outdoor and mountain lover60#739 of 1,949#46 of 72Map
Rural value seeker49#1,017 of 1,958#54 of 74Map
High-net-worth mover64#262 of 1,949#7 of 72Map
Lottery winner61#895 of 1,973#11 of 77Map
Climate-resilient relocation70#626 of 1,877#39 of 67Map
Coastal livingnot ranked: below the minimum for coast–Map
Business owner61#961 of 1,877#19 of 67Map
Digital native53#648 of 1,480#7 of 49Map

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Services nearby (people within 10 km: shops, doctors, cafes, transport)100
  • University-town character (universities relative to the people nearby)98
  • Climate exposure (estimate: coastal and river flooding, heat; 100 = low)92
  • One-day truck radius (residents within 300 km, across borders)91
  • Universities in town (universities and universities of applied sciences within 10 km)91
  • Safety and community84
  • Home market (residents of the same country within 150 km)80
  • Climate (mild and sunny: climate class and winter daylight)76
  • Governance and fiscal strength74
  • Demographics73
  • Freight access (motorway, rail, port)70
  • Lifestyle and amenities68
  • Foundation66
  • Jobs and economy63
  • Market reach (residents within 100 km, across borders)58
  • Mobility and connectivity51
  • Mountains and water (terrain relief, lakes and the sea nearby)50
  • Green space49
  • Education and family49
  • Health and elderly40
  • City scale (people within 10 km: big-city life, transit, scenes)38
  • Affordability33
  • Flat land (terrain relief)15
  • Port access (major sea or inland port)0
  • Chemical park nearby (sites with pipeline links)0
  • Financial centre (banking and capital markets) within commuting distance0
  • Commodity-trading or gold hub within commuting distance0
  • Crypto hub within commuting distance0
  • Wealth-management centre within commuting distance0

Nearby

Data: Eurostat GISCO LAU 2024; locations EDJNet LAU centres; airports OurAirports; coastline Natural Earth. Updated 2026-10-31. Rankings are decision aids, not advice.